G2 Grid Report for Procure to Pay Fall 2025
The G2 Grid represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 rates products from the Procure to Pay category algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 users and data sourced from third parties. Lae alla document1© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may b e reproduced or distributed in any form without G2’s prior written
permission. While the information in this report has b een obtained from sources b elieved to b e reliable, G2 disclaims all warranties as to the
accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.
Grid® Report for Procure to Pay
Fall 2025
Procure to Pay Software
(Procure to Pay Software continues on next page)
Satisfaction
Market Presence
Leaders
High Performers
Contenders
Niche
G2 Grid® Scoring
Medius
Procuzy
ePROMIS
ERPR
Varis
Vroozi
BirchStreet
PairSoft
apexanalytix
ProcureDesk
Pipefy
Stampli
Certa
Teampay
Finly
MHC
Software
Basware Oracle
EPM Cloud
GEP SMART
Payflows Precoro
Unimarket
Pivot
PRM360
PayEm
Planergy
DualEntry Pluto
Xelix
Ramp
mjPRO
Zip
Ivalua
Coupa
SAP Ariba
Procurify
Airbase
permission. While the information in this report has b een obtained from sources b elieved to b e reliable, G2 disclaims all warranties as to the
accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.
Grid® Report for Procure to Pay
Fall 2025
Procure to Pay Software
(Procure to Pay Software continues on next page)
Satisfaction
Market Presence
Leaders
High Performers
Contenders
Niche
G2 Grid® Scoring
Medius
Procuzy
ePROMIS
ERPR
Varis
Vroozi
BirchStreet
PairSoft
apexanalytix
ProcureDesk
Pipefy
Stampli
Certa
Teampay
Finly
MHC
Software
Basware Oracle
EPM Cloud
GEP SMART
Payflows Precoro
Unimarket
Pivot
PRM360
PayEm
Planergy
DualEntry Pluto
Xelix
Ramp
mjPRO
Zip
Ivalua
Coupa
SAP Ariba
Procurify
Airbase
2Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Fall 2025
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Procure to Pay Software (continued)
Procure to Pay Software Definition
Procure to pay software manages all procurement activities, from purchasing to vendor payments. This type of software helps companies
streamline procurement operations and increase efficiency by using one centralized system instead of separate solutions. Procure to pay
solutions are mostly used by procurement professionals but can also be leveraged by accountants to monitor invoices and payments. Suppliers
may also use procure to pay software through online portals.
Procure to pay software is usually delivered as a mix of multiple solutions or as a standalone software suite. When not included in the product,
procure to pay software needs to integrate with AP automation software and supplier relationship software. Integration with e-commerce
platforms and supply chain suites is also essential.
To qualify for inclusion in the Procure to Pay category, a product must:
Consolidate procurement information from multiple data sources
Manage all or most operations that are part of the procurement cycle
Create and implement purchasing policies and best practices
Monitor financial transactions related to procurement
Define and manage procurement business processes
Procure to Pay Grid® Scoring Description
Products shown on the Grid® for Procure to Pay have received a minimum of 10 reviews/ratings in data gathered by August 12, 2025. Products are
ranked by customer satisfaction (based on user reviews) and market presence (based on market share, seller size, and social impact) and placed
into four categories on the Grid®:
Products in the Leader quadrant are rated highly by G2 users and have substantial Market Presence scores. Leaders include: SAP Ariba,
mjPRO, Coupa, Procurify, Ramp, Zip, Ivalua, and Airbase
High Performing products have high customer Satisfaction scores and low Market Presence compared to the rest of the category. High
Performers include: Pluto, DualEntry, Precoro, Pivot, Unimarket, Payflows, PayEm, PRM360, Xelix, and Planergy
Contender products have relatively low customer Satisfaction scores and high Market Presence compared to the rest of the category.
While they may have positive reviews, they do not have enough reviews to validate those ratings. Contenders include: GEP SMART, Oracle
Procurement Cloud, and Basware
Niche products have relatively low Satisfaction scores and low Market Presence compared to the rest of the category. While they may have
positive reviews, they do not have enough reviews to validate those ratings. Niche products include: Pipefy, Teampay, Stampli, apexanalytix,
Certa, ProcureDesk, Vroozi, MHC Software, ePROMIS ERP, PairSoft, Varis, Medius, BirchStreet, Procuzy, and Finly
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Procure to Pay Software (continued)
Procure to Pay Software Definition
Procure to pay software manages all procurement activities, from purchasing to vendor payments. This type of software helps companies
streamline procurement operations and increase efficiency by using one centralized system instead of separate solutions. Procure to pay
solutions are mostly used by procurement professionals but can also be leveraged by accountants to monitor invoices and payments. Suppliers
may also use procure to pay software through online portals.
Procure to pay software is usually delivered as a mix of multiple solutions or as a standalone software suite. When not included in the product,
procure to pay software needs to integrate with AP automation software and supplier relationship software. Integration with e-commerce
platforms and supply chain suites is also essential.
To qualify for inclusion in the Procure to Pay category, a product must:
Consolidate procurement information from multiple data sources
Manage all or most operations that are part of the procurement cycle
Create and implement purchasing policies and best practices
Monitor financial transactions related to procurement
Define and manage procurement business processes
Procure to Pay Grid® Scoring Description
Products shown on the Grid® for Procure to Pay have received a minimum of 10 reviews/ratings in data gathered by August 12, 2025. Products are
ranked by customer satisfaction (based on user reviews) and market presence (based on market share, seller size, and social impact) and placed
into four categories on the Grid®:
Products in the Leader quadrant are rated highly by G2 users and have substantial Market Presence scores. Leaders include: SAP Ariba,
mjPRO, Coupa, Procurify, Ramp, Zip, Ivalua, and Airbase
High Performing products have high customer Satisfaction scores and low Market Presence compared to the rest of the category. High
Performers include: Pluto, DualEntry, Precoro, Pivot, Unimarket, Payflows, PayEm, PRM360, Xelix, and Planergy
Contender products have relatively low customer Satisfaction scores and high Market Presence compared to the rest of the category.
While they may have positive reviews, they do not have enough reviews to validate those ratings. Contenders include: GEP SMART, Oracle
Procurement Cloud, and Basware
Niche products have relatively low Satisfaction scores and low Market Presence compared to the rest of the category. While they may have
positive reviews, they do not have enough reviews to validate those ratings. Niche products include: Pipefy, Teampay, Stampli, apexanalytix,
Certa, ProcureDesk, Vroozi, MHC Software, ePROMIS ERP, PairSoft, Varis, Medius, BirchStreet, Procuzy, and Finly
3Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Fall 2025
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine product placement on the Grid®. To learn more about each
of the products, please see the profile section.
Leaders
# of Reviews Satisfaction Market Presence G2 Score
SAP Ariba 322 70 99 84
mjPRO 198 97 69 83
Coupa 212 60 77 68
Procurify 84 73 54 63
Ramp 47 72 51 62
Zip 49 63 55 59
Ivalua 50 55 63 59
Airbase 70 58 59 58
High Performers
Pluto 104 90 35 62
DualEntry 43 79 35 57
Precoro 110 63 42 52
Pivot 22 70 31 51
Unimarket 23 63 37 50
Payflows 17 60 37 49
PayEm 41 57 35 46
PRM360 117 65 23 44
Xelix 24 55 15 35
Planergy 14 51 14 33
* Products are ordered by G2 Score. Satisfaction score is used as a tiebreaker if two products have the same G2 Score.
(Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software continues on next page)
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine product placement on the Grid®. To learn more about each
of the products, please see the profile section.
Leaders
# of Reviews Satisfaction Market Presence G2 Score
SAP Ariba 322 70 99 84
mjPRO 198 97 69 83
Coupa 212 60 77 68
Procurify 84 73 54 63
Ramp 47 72 51 62
Zip 49 63 55 59
Ivalua 50 55 63 59
Airbase 70 58 59 58
High Performers
Pluto 104 90 35 62
DualEntry 43 79 35 57
Precoro 110 63 42 52
Pivot 22 70 31 51
Unimarket 23 63 37 50
Payflows 17 60 37 49
PayEm 41 57 35 46
PRM360 117 65 23 44
Xelix 24 55 15 35
Planergy 14 51 14 33
* Products are ordered by G2 Score. Satisfaction score is used as a tiebreaker if two products have the same G2 Score.
(Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software continues on next page)
4Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Fall 2025
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software
(continued)
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine product placement on the Grid®. To learn more about each
of the products, please see the profile section.
Contenders
# of Reviews Satisfaction Market Presence G2 Score
GEP SMART 12 27 58 43
Oracle EPM Cloud 16 23 55 39
Basware 56 16 56 36
Niche
Pipefy 44 46 50 48
Teampay 13 50 36 43
Stampli 13 43 41 42
apexanalytix 11 43 41 42
Certa 16 49 33 41
ProcureDesk 11 49 31 40
Vroozi 27 40 36 38
MHC Software 56 37 35 36
ePROMIS ERP 10 48 23 36
PairSoft 28 41 21 31
Varis 43 44 14 29
Medius 14 23 34 29
BirchStreet 13 43 14 29
Procuzy 13 40 10 25
Finly 10 0 5 2
* Products are ordered by G2 Score. Satisfaction score is used as a tiebreaker if two products have the same G2 Score.
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software
(continued)
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine product placement on the Grid®. To learn more about each
of the products, please see the profile section.
Contenders
# of Reviews Satisfaction Market Presence G2 Score
GEP SMART 12 27 58 43
Oracle EPM Cloud 16 23 55 39
Basware 56 16 56 36
Niche
Pipefy 44 46 50 48
Teampay 13 50 36 43
Stampli 13 43 41 42
apexanalytix 11 43 41 42
Certa 16 49 33 41
ProcureDesk 11 49 31 40
Vroozi 27 40 36 38
MHC Software 56 37 35 36
ePROMIS ERP 10 48 23 36
PairSoft 28 41 21 31
Varis 43 44 14 29
Medius 14 23 34 29
BirchStreet 13 43 14 29
Procuzy 13 40 10 25
Finly 10 0 5 2
* Products are ordered by G2 Score. Satisfaction score is used as a tiebreaker if two products have the same G2 Score.
5Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Fall 2025
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
(Grid® Methodology continues on next page)
**Net Promoter, Net Promoter System, Net Promoter Score, NPS and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix
Systems, Inc.
Grid® Methodology
Grid® Rating Methodology
The Grid® represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 rates products from the
Procure to Pay category algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 users and data sourced from third parties.
Technology buyers can use the Grid® to help them quickly select the best products for their businesses and to find peers with similar experiences.
For sellers, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid® provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.
Grid® Scoring Methodology
The Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Fall 2025 is based on reviews collected through August 12, 2025. We apply unique algorithms to this data to
calculate Satisfaction (v4.0) and Market Presence (v7.0) scores for the Fall 2025 report quarter. To view the Procure to Pay Grid® with the most
recent data, please visit the Procure to Pay page. For more details on Grid® Scoring, please view the G2 Scoring Methodology here.
Grid® Categorization Methodology
Making G2 research relevant and easy for people to use as they evaluate and select business software products is one of our most important
goals. In support of that goal, organizing products and software companies in a well-defined structure that makes capturing, evaluating, and
displaying reviews and other research in an orderly manner is a critical part of the research process.
To manage the process of categorizing the software products and the related reviews in the G2 community, G2 follows a publicly available
categorization methodology. All products appearing on the Grid® have passed through G2’s categorization methodology and meet G2’s category
standards.
Many terms that appear regularly across G2 and are used to aid in product categorization warrant a definition to facilitate buyer understanding.
These terms may be included within reviews from the G2 community or in executive summaries for products included on the Grid®. A list of
standard definitions is available to G2 users to eliminate confusion and ease the buying process.
Rating Changes and Dynamics
The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and third-party data collected by G2 up through August 12, 2025. The ratings
may change as the products are further developed, the sellers grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 updates the ratings on its
website in real time as additional data is received, and this report will be updated as significant data is received. By improving their products and
support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, Contenders may become Leaders and Niche sellers may become High Performers.
Trust
Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. G2 follows defined community guidelines to ensure privacy, and authenticity for users and
reviews. For more details, please view the G2 Community Guidelines here.
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
(Grid® Methodology continues on next page)
**Net Promoter, Net Promoter System, Net Promoter Score, NPS and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix
Systems, Inc.
Grid® Methodology
Grid® Rating Methodology
The Grid® represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 rates products from the
Procure to Pay category algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 users and data sourced from third parties.
Technology buyers can use the Grid® to help them quickly select the best products for their businesses and to find peers with similar experiences.
For sellers, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid® provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.
Grid® Scoring Methodology
The Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Fall 2025 is based on reviews collected through August 12, 2025. We apply unique algorithms to this data to
calculate Satisfaction (v4.0) and Market Presence (v7.0) scores for the Fall 2025 report quarter. To view the Procure to Pay Grid® with the most
recent data, please visit the Procure to Pay page. For more details on Grid® Scoring, please view the G2 Scoring Methodology here.
Grid® Categorization Methodology
Making G2 research relevant and easy for people to use as they evaluate and select business software products is one of our most important
goals. In support of that goal, organizing products and software companies in a well-defined structure that makes capturing, evaluating, and
displaying reviews and other research in an orderly manner is a critical part of the research process.
To manage the process of categorizing the software products and the related reviews in the G2 community, G2 follows a publicly available
categorization methodology. All products appearing on the Grid® have passed through G2’s categorization methodology and meet G2’s category
standards.
Many terms that appear regularly across G2 and are used to aid in product categorization warrant a definition to facilitate buyer understanding.
These terms may be included within reviews from the G2 community or in executive summaries for products included on the Grid®. A list of
standard definitions is available to G2 users to eliminate confusion and ease the buying process.
Rating Changes and Dynamics
The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and third-party data collected by G2 up through August 12, 2025. The ratings
may change as the products are further developed, the sellers grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 updates the ratings on its
website in real time as additional data is received, and this report will be updated as significant data is received. By improving their products and
support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, Contenders may become Leaders and Niche sellers may become High Performers.
Trust
Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. G2 follows defined community guidelines to ensure privacy, and authenticity for users and
reviews. For more details, please view the G2 Community Guidelines here.