G2 Grid Report for Procure to Pay Summer 2025
The G2 Grid represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 rates products from the Procure to Pay category algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 users and data sourced from third parties. Dokument herunterladenSatisfaction
Market Presence
Leaders
High Performers
Contenders
Niche
G2 Grid® Scoring
Vroozi
apexanalytix
MHC Software
PairSoft
Varis
Medius
ProcuzyReactorNet
EPRO
Finly
Basware
Oracle EPM Cloud Pipefy
GEP SMART
PayEm
Payflows
Ramp
Certa
Planergy
Xelix
PRM360
Pluto
Pivot
Precoro
Unimarket
ePROMIS ERPR
Coupa
Zip
mjPRO
SAP Ariba
Procurify
Ivalua
Airbase
1© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form without G2’s prior written
permission. While the information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, G2 disclaims all warranties as to the
accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.
Grid® Report for Procure to Pay
Summer 2025
(Procure to Pay Software continues on next page)
Procure to Pay Software
Market Presence
Leaders
High Performers
Contenders
Niche
G2 Grid® Scoring
Vroozi
apexanalytix
MHC Software
PairSoft
Varis
Medius
ProcuzyReactorNet
EPRO
Finly
Basware
Oracle EPM Cloud Pipefy
GEP SMART
PayEm
Payflows
Ramp
Certa
Planergy
Xelix
PRM360
Pluto
Pivot
Precoro
Unimarket
ePROMIS ERPR
Coupa
Zip
mjPRO
SAP Ariba
Procurify
Ivalua
Airbase
1© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form without G2’s prior written
permission. While the information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, G2 disclaims all warranties as to the
accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of such information and shall have no liability for errors, omissions, or inadequacies in such information.
Grid® Report for Procure to Pay
Summer 2025
(Procure to Pay Software continues on next page)
Procure to Pay Software
2Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Summer 2025
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Procure to Pay Software (continued)
Procure to Pay Software Definition
Procure to pay software manages all procurement activities, from purchasing to vendor payments. This type of software helps companies
streamline procurement operations and increase efficiency by using one centralized system instead of separate solutions. Procure to pay
solutions are mostly used by procurement professionals but can also be leveraged by accountants to monitor invoices and payments. Suppliers
may also use procure to pay software through online portals.
Procure to pay software is usually delivered as a mix of multiple solutions or as a standalone software suite. When not included in the product,
procure to pay software needs to integrate with AP automation software and supplier relationship software. Integration with e-commerce
platforms and supply chain suites is also essential.
To qualify for inclusion in the Procure to Pay category, a product must:
Consolidate procurement information from multiple data sources
Manage all or most operations that are part of the procurement cycle
Create and implement purchasing policies and best practices
Monitor financial transactions related to procurement
Define and manage procurement business processes
Procure to Pay Grid® Scoring Description
Products shown on the Grid® for Procure to Pay have received a minimum of 10 reviews/ratings in data gathered by May 27, 2025. Products are
ranked by customer satisfaction (based on user reviews) and market presence (based on market share, seller size, and social impact) and placed
into four categories on the Grid®:
Products in the Leader quadrant are rated highly by G2 users and have substantial Market Presence scores. Leaders include: SAP Ariba,
mjPRO, Coupa, Procurify, Airbase, Zip, and Ivalua
High Performing products have high customer Satisfaction scores and low Market Presence compared to the rest of the category. High
Performers include: Pluto, Ramp, Pivot, Unimarket, Precoro, Payflows, PayEm, PRM360, Certa, Xelix, Planergy, and ePROMIS ERP
Contender products have relatively low customer Satisfaction scores and high Market Presence compared to the rest of the category.
While they may have positive reviews, they do not have enough reviews to validate those ratings. Contenders include: Pipefy, GEP SMART,
Oracle Procurement Cloud, and Basware
Niche products have relatively low Satisfaction scores and low Market Presence compared to the rest of the category. While they may
have positive reviews, they do not have enough reviews to validate those ratings. Niche products include: apexanalytix, Vroozi, MHC
Software, PairSoft, Medius, Varis, Procuzy, ReactorNet EPRO, and Finly
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Procure to Pay Software (continued)
Procure to Pay Software Definition
Procure to pay software manages all procurement activities, from purchasing to vendor payments. This type of software helps companies
streamline procurement operations and increase efficiency by using one centralized system instead of separate solutions. Procure to pay
solutions are mostly used by procurement professionals but can also be leveraged by accountants to monitor invoices and payments. Suppliers
may also use procure to pay software through online portals.
Procure to pay software is usually delivered as a mix of multiple solutions or as a standalone software suite. When not included in the product,
procure to pay software needs to integrate with AP automation software and supplier relationship software. Integration with e-commerce
platforms and supply chain suites is also essential.
To qualify for inclusion in the Procure to Pay category, a product must:
Consolidate procurement information from multiple data sources
Manage all or most operations that are part of the procurement cycle
Create and implement purchasing policies and best practices
Monitor financial transactions related to procurement
Define and manage procurement business processes
Procure to Pay Grid® Scoring Description
Products shown on the Grid® for Procure to Pay have received a minimum of 10 reviews/ratings in data gathered by May 27, 2025. Products are
ranked by customer satisfaction (based on user reviews) and market presence (based on market share, seller size, and social impact) and placed
into four categories on the Grid®:
Products in the Leader quadrant are rated highly by G2 users and have substantial Market Presence scores. Leaders include: SAP Ariba,
mjPRO, Coupa, Procurify, Airbase, Zip, and Ivalua
High Performing products have high customer Satisfaction scores and low Market Presence compared to the rest of the category. High
Performers include: Pluto, Ramp, Pivot, Unimarket, Precoro, Payflows, PayEm, PRM360, Certa, Xelix, Planergy, and ePROMIS ERP
Contender products have relatively low customer Satisfaction scores and high Market Presence compared to the rest of the category.
While they may have positive reviews, they do not have enough reviews to validate those ratings. Contenders include: Pipefy, GEP SMART,
Oracle Procurement Cloud, and Basware
Niche products have relatively low Satisfaction scores and low Market Presence compared to the rest of the category. While they may
have positive reviews, they do not have enough reviews to validate those ratings. Niche products include: apexanalytix, Vroozi, MHC
Software, PairSoft, Medius, Varis, Procuzy, ReactorNet EPRO, and Finly
3Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Summer 2025
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine product placement on the Grid®. To learn more about each
of the products, please see the profile section.
Leaders
# of Reviews Satisfaction Market Presence G2 Score
SAP Ariba 315 67 99 83
mjPRO 195 97 67 82
Coupa 210 61 83 72
Procurify 82 70 51 61
Airbase 70 61 58 59
Zip 49 62 53 58
Ivalua 47 53 63 58
High Performers
Pluto 103 88 36 62
Ramp 45 70 49 60
Pivot 22 71 30 51
Unimarket 23 64 35 50
Precoro 104 60 39 49
Payflows 17 61 35 48
PayEm 39 60 32 46
PRM360 117 67 18 42
Certa 16 52 31 41
Xelix 24 57 12 34
Planergy 14 53 15 34
ePROMIS ERP 10 51 16 34
* Products are ordered by G2 Score. Satisfaction score is used as a tiebreaker if two products have the same G2 Score.
(Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software continues on next page)
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine product placement on the Grid®. To learn more about each
of the products, please see the profile section.
Leaders
# of Reviews Satisfaction Market Presence G2 Score
SAP Ariba 315 67 99 83
mjPRO 195 97 67 82
Coupa 210 61 83 72
Procurify 82 70 51 61
Airbase 70 61 58 59
Zip 49 62 53 58
Ivalua 47 53 63 58
High Performers
Pluto 103 88 36 62
Ramp 45 70 49 60
Pivot 22 71 30 51
Unimarket 23 64 35 50
Precoro 104 60 39 49
Payflows 17 61 35 48
PayEm 39 60 32 46
PRM360 117 67 18 42
Certa 16 52 31 41
Xelix 24 57 12 34
Planergy 14 53 15 34
ePROMIS ERP 10 51 16 34
* Products are ordered by G2 Score. Satisfaction score is used as a tiebreaker if two products have the same G2 Score.
(Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software continues on next page)
4Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Summer 2025
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software
(continued)
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine product placement on the Grid®. To learn more about each
of the products, please see the profile section.
Contenders
# of Reviews Satisfaction Market Presence G2 Score
Pipefy 44 50 52 51
GEP SMART 12 32 60 46
Oracle EPM Cloud 16 26 52 39
Basware 56 19 58 39
Niche
apexanalytix 11 45 42 44
Vroozi 26 43 33 38
MHC Software 54 38 34 36
PairSoft 28 44 18 31
Medius 14 30 31 31
Varis 43 47 11 29
Procuzy 13 44 10 27
ReactorNet EPRO 10 18 10 14
Finly 10 0 5 2
* Products are ordered by G2 Score. Satisfaction score is used as a tiebreaker if two products have the same G2 Score.
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
Grid® Scores for Procure to Pay Software
(continued)
The table below shows the Satisfaction and Market Presence scores that determine product placement on the Grid®. To learn more about each
of the products, please see the profile section.
Contenders
# of Reviews Satisfaction Market Presence G2 Score
Pipefy 44 50 52 51
GEP SMART 12 32 60 46
Oracle EPM Cloud 16 26 52 39
Basware 56 19 58 39
Niche
apexanalytix 11 45 42 44
Vroozi 26 43 33 38
MHC Software 54 38 34 36
PairSoft 28 44 18 31
Medius 14 30 31 31
Varis 43 47 11 29
Procuzy 13 44 10 27
ReactorNet EPRO 10 18 10 14
Finly 10 0 5 2
* Products are ordered by G2 Score. Satisfaction score is used as a tiebreaker if two products have the same G2 Score.
5Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Summer 2025
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
(Grid® Methodology continues on next page)
** Net Promoter, Net Promoter System, Net Promoter Score, NPS and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix
Software, Inc.
Grid® Methodology
Grid® Rating Methodology
The Grid® represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 rates products from the
Procure to Pay category algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 users and data sourced from third parties.
Technology buyers can use the Grid® to help them quickly select the best products for their businesses and to find peers with similar experiences.
For sellers, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid® provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.
Grid® Scoring Methodology
The Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Summer 2025 is based on reviews collected through May 27, 2025. We apply unique algorithms to this data
to calculate Satisfaction (v4.0) and Market Presence (v7.0) scores for the Summer 2025 report quarter. To view the Procure to Pay Grid® with the
most recent data, please visit the Procure to Pay page. For more details on Grid® Scoring, please view the G2 Scoring Methodology here.
Grid® Categorization Methodology
Making G2 research relevant and easy for people to use as they evaluate and select business software products is one of our most important
goals. In support of that goal, organizing products and software companies in a well-defined structure that makes capturing, evaluating, and
displaying reviews and other research in an orderly manner is a critical part of the research process.
To manage the process of categorizing the software products and the related reviews in the G2 community, G2 follows a publicly available
categorization methodology. All products appearing on the Grid® have passed through G2’s categorization methodology and meet G2’s category
standards.
Many terms that appear regularly across G2 and are used to aid in product categorization warrant a definition to facilitate buyer understanding.
These terms may be included within reviews from the G2 community or in executive summaries for products included on the Grid®. A list of
standard definitions is available to G2 users to eliminate confusion and ease the buying process.
Rating Changes and Dynamics
The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and third-party data collected by G2 up through May 27, 2025. The ratings
may change as the products are further developed, the sellers grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 updates the ratings on its
website in real time as additional data is received, and this report will be updated as significant data is received. By improving their products and
support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, Contenders may become Leaders and Niche sellers may become High Performers.
Trust
Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. G2 follows defined community guidelines to ensure privacy, and authenticity for users and
reviews. For more details, please view the G2 Community Guidelines here.
© 2025 G2, Inc. All rights reser v ed.
(Grid® Methodology continues on next page)
** Net Promoter, Net Promoter System, Net Promoter Score, NPS and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Fred Reichheld and Satmetrix
Software, Inc.
Grid® Methodology
Grid® Rating Methodology
The Grid® represents the democratic voice of real software users, rather than the subjective opinion of one analyst. G2 rates products from the
Procure to Pay category algorithmically based on data sourced from product reviews shared by G2 users and data sourced from third parties.
Technology buyers can use the Grid® to help them quickly select the best products for their businesses and to find peers with similar experiences.
For sellers, media, investors, and analysts, the Grid® provides benchmarks for product comparison and market trend analysis.
Grid® Scoring Methodology
The Grid® Report for Procure to Pay | Summer 2025 is based on reviews collected through May 27, 2025. We apply unique algorithms to this data
to calculate Satisfaction (v4.0) and Market Presence (v7.0) scores for the Summer 2025 report quarter. To view the Procure to Pay Grid® with the
most recent data, please visit the Procure to Pay page. For more details on Grid® Scoring, please view the G2 Scoring Methodology here.
Grid® Categorization Methodology
Making G2 research relevant and easy for people to use as they evaluate and select business software products is one of our most important
goals. In support of that goal, organizing products and software companies in a well-defined structure that makes capturing, evaluating, and
displaying reviews and other research in an orderly manner is a critical part of the research process.
To manage the process of categorizing the software products and the related reviews in the G2 community, G2 follows a publicly available
categorization methodology. All products appearing on the Grid® have passed through G2’s categorization methodology and meet G2’s category
standards.
Many terms that appear regularly across G2 and are used to aid in product categorization warrant a definition to facilitate buyer understanding.
These terms may be included within reviews from the G2 community or in executive summaries for products included on the Grid®. A list of
standard definitions is available to G2 users to eliminate confusion and ease the buying process.
Rating Changes and Dynamics
The ratings in this report are based on a snapshot of the user reviews and third-party data collected by G2 up through May 27, 2025. The ratings
may change as the products are further developed, the sellers grow, and as additional opinions are shared by users. G2 updates the ratings on its
website in real time as additional data is received, and this report will be updated as significant data is received. By improving their products and
support and/or by having more satisfied customer voices heard, Contenders may become Leaders and Niche sellers may become High Performers.
Trust
Keeping our ratings unbiased is our top priority. G2 follows defined community guidelines to ensure privacy, and authenticity for users and
reviews. For more details, please view the G2 Community Guidelines here.