Four in Five Banks Worldwide Have Attempted to Automate Financial Processes to Boost Data Quality, Says Economist Intelligence Unit Survey

Most Automation Efforts Result in Faster Processes, Lower Headcount and Fewer Control Errors, Say Bank Executives

NEW YORK - April 14, 2009 - Financial processes are the essence of banking, so automating these processes is a key goal for banks struggling to increase both efficiency and data integrity, according to Mastering banking risk through embedded governance, risk and compliance, a survey and paper from the Economist Intelligence Unit, sponsored by SAP. However, most banks still focus mainly on restraining costs and avoiding regulatory sanctions rather than developing an enterprise view of risk. This conservative approach has ironically increased risk exposure at the enterprise level even as it contributes to stronger risk management practices within functions and business lines.

Bank executives rank the proliferation of manual processes as the greatest problem with current financial processes. They see fewer errors as the biggest benefit of automation. And they believe that the high-level of investment required is the single largest obstacle. Eighty-two percent of bank respondents have attempted to automate at least some of their processes; such banks had experienced the following tangible improvements:

Faster processing speed claimed by 74 percent of respondents.
Sixty-five percent of respondents cite fewer control errors.
A decrease in headcount according to 52 percent of respondents.
From the respondents, 49 percent claimed a reduction in the number of poor quality decisions.

"Process automation used to be purely cost-driven - a matter of squeezing out the inefficiencies left over from legacy paper-based processes," said Dan Armstrong, senior editor at the Economist Intelligence Unit and manager of the research. "Now it's more about providing managers with quick access to accurate enterprise-wide data, and using it to inform the bank's risk and reward decisions."

The findings were based on the responses of 71 bank executives across the world who took part in larger financial process automation survey in the fourth quarter of 2008. Key findings include:

Biggest Problems with Current Financial Processes. Bank executives that participated in the survey paint a rather negative picture of their financial processes. Half say there are too many manual processes in their organizations; 38 percent say methodologies are inconsistent and the remainder point to poor visibility and accountability, overly restrictive and redundant controls, incompatible applications and the need to massage data to make it comparable.
Benefits to Automate Financial Processes. The majority of bankers surveyed claimed that the biggest benefit of financial process automation is the elimination of errors due to manual processes and data integrity. Cost reduction was a distant third at 31 percent, which indicates that many banks have progressed beyond efficiency as the primary rationale for automation.
Barriers to Financial Process Automation. However, the upfront costs of financial process automation continue to represent a significant barrier to automate a banks financial process, according to survey respondents. Six in ten bankers cite upfront costs as one of the top two obstacles. No other impediment was cited by more than 30 percent of the respondents. However, only 8 percent of executives say that processes are already sufficiently fast, accurate and efficient, and need no further improvement.

"SAP has found the survey results revealing, as they will enable us to work even closer with our customers in helping them address the immediate issues they have today in managing credit, market and operational risk," said Martin Schroter, vice president, Solution Management, Banking, SAP AG. "SAP delivers governance, risk and compliance solutions with integrated business insight to support a bank's end-to-end cross-enterprise business processes and access controls to improve business process management and automation for detecting, remedying, mitigating and preventing access and authorization risk across the enterprise."

About the Economist Intelligence Unit
The Economist Intelligence Unit is the world leader in global business intelligence. It is the business-to-business arm of The Economist Group, which publishes The Economist newspaper.

The Economist Intelligence Unit provides geopolitical, economic and business analysis on more than 200 countries, as well as strategic intelligence on key industries and management practices. With over 300 full-time professionals in 40 offices around the world, supported by a global network of more than 700 contributing analysts, the Economist Intelligence Unit is widely known for its unparalleled coverage of major and emerging markets. More information about the Economist Intelligence Unit can be found on the Web at www.eiu.com.

About SAP
SAP is the world's leading provider of business software(*), offering applications and services that enable companies of all sizes and in more than 25 industries to become best-run businesses. With more than 82,000 customers in over 120 countries, the company is listed on several exchanges, including the Frankfurt stock exchange and NYSE, under the symbol "SAP." For more information, visit www.sap.com.

(*) SAP defines business software as comprising enterprise resource planning and related applications.

Any statements contained in this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "may," "plan," "project," "predict," "should" and "will" and similar expressions as they relate to SAP are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. SAP undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. The factors that could affect SAP's future financial results are discussed more fully in SAP's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including SAP's most recent Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates.

Copyright © 2009 SAP AG. All rights reserved.
SAP, R/3, mySAP, mySAP.com, xApps, xApp, SAP NetWeaver and other SAP products and services mentioned herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several other countries all over the world. All other product and service names mentioned are the trademarks of their respective companies. Data contained in this document serve informational purposes only. National product specifications may vary.

Note to editors:
To preview and download broadcast-standard stock footage and press photos digitally, please visit www.sap.com/stockfootage. On this newly launched platform you can find high resolution material for your media channels. To view video stories on diverse topics, visit www.sap-tv.com. From this site, you can embed videos into your own Web pages, share video via e-mail links and subscribe to RSS feeds from SAP TV.

For customers interested in learning more about SAP products:
Global Customer Center: +49 180 534-34-24
United States Only: 1 (800) 872-1SAP (1-800-872-1727)

For more information, press only:
Joanne McKenna, Economist Intelligence Unit, +44 (0)20 7576 8188, joannemckenna@eiu.com
Dan Armstrong, Economist Intelligence Unit, +01 212 698 9710, danarmstrong@eiu.com
Evan Welsh, +49 (6227) 7-67514, evan.welsh@sap.com, CET
SAP Press Office, +49 (6227) 7-46315, CET; +1 (610) 661-3200, EDT; press@sap.com
Jim Sarlo, Burson-Marsteller, +1 (312) 596-3525, jim.sarlo@bm.com, CDT